Primary School Teacher Candidates’ Experiences of Resistance to Learning Mathematics: A Phenomenological Study

Main Article Content

Murat Baş
Buse Şefik

Abstract

Resistance to learning mathematics refers to individuals’ active or passive opposition to learning processes and the development of motivational barriers. This phenomenon is particularly common among preservice primary school teachers, who often experienced such resistance during their own schooling and must address it during their professional development to avoid transferring it to their future students. Understanding this experience is critical, as they shape future pedagogical practices and approaches to student resistance. This study aimed to reveal the structural essence of preservice teachers’ resistance to learning mathematics developed during their student years and its reflections on their future professional approaches. A phenomenological design was employed to explore the subjective meanings of lived experiences. The study group consisted of 15 fourth-year preservice primary school teachers enrolled in the Primary Education Department of a state university, selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using content analysis following a reflective epoche process. Four core structural themes emerged. The findings indicate that resistance to learning mathematics is not merely a past academic issue but a significant affective legacy influencing future teaching practices.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Primary School Teacher Candidates’ Experiences of Resistance to Learning Mathematics: A Phenomenological Study. (2026). Journal of Advances in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 1. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20121417

References

Ata Baran, A. (2018). Matematiğe ilişkin duyuşsal alan faktörleri ve PISA kavramsal çerçevesi. In T. Kabael, Matematik okuryazarlığı ve PISA (pp. 45–57). Anı Yayıncılık.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.

Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554

Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640902902252

Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Beilock, S. L., Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., & Levine, S. C. (2010). Female teachers’ math anxiety affects girls’ math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(5), 1860–1863. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910967107

Bekdemir, M. (2010). The pre-service teachers’ mathematics anxiety related to depth of negative experiences in mathematics classroom while they were students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(3), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9260-7

Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R. S. Valle & M. King, Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology (pp. 48–71). Oxford University Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications.

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903

Frank, A. W. (1995). The wounded storyteller: Body, illness, and ethics. University of Chicago Press.

Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. University of Chicago Press.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. SAGE Publications.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. SAGE Publications.

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127–146). Macmillan.

Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26.

Tatlıoğlu, S. S. (2021). Öğrenmeye sosyal-bilişsel bir bakış: Albert Bandura. Sosyoloji Notları, 5(1), 15-30.

Toluk Uçar, Z. T., & Demirsoy, N. H. (2010). Eski-yeni ikilemi: Matematik öğretmenlerinin matematiksel inançları ve uygulamaları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 39(39), 321-332.

Yüksel, S. (2004). Eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin öğretme-öğrenme süreçlerine yönelik direnç davranışları. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(3), 341–354.